enigma 521 Posted December 11, 2009 Read this link My linkand see why I said what I said. From your link from Memory Alpha. As a consequence, the star "Archer", which Archer IV supposedly orbits, is placed near Klingon territory several hundred light years away from Sol according to the Star Charts. This isn't 25 light years from Earth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Praeothmin 532 Posted December 11, 2009 From your link from Memory Alpha. This isn't 25 light years from Earth. Although the same article states it's a mistake: The original production artwork can be viewed at MikeSussman.net and places the Archer system at 61 Ursae Majoris. The Star Trek: Star Charts falsely states the planet to be Loracus Prime, which actually is a misinterpretation of a prop seen early in the episode "Strange New World". As a consequence, the star "Archer", which Archer IV supposedly orbits, is placed near Klingon territory several hundred light years away from Sol according to the Star Charts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enigma 521 Posted December 11, 2009 Although the same article states it's a mistake: My bad. Still I think the Feds got off lightly losing just 40 billion people unless the Federation of that timeline had a drastically lower population prewar compared to the main timeline. For them to be soon forced to surrender within six months after losing only 40 billion is weird compared to the whackos in DS9 who claim that 900 billion would die to the Dominion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Praeothmin 532 Posted December 11, 2009 My bad. Still I think the Feds got off lightly losing just 40 billion people unless the Federation of that timeline had a drastically lower population prewar compared to the main timeline. For them to be soon forced to surrender within six months after losing only 40 billion is weird compared to the whackos in DS9 who claim that 900 billion would die to the Dominion. Well, the Dominion War was fought against an enemy that had over what, 30 000 ships, and had already attacked Earth, so it is plausible to think that had they continued to fight, the UFP could have lost many of its most populated worlds, while in Yesterday's enterprise, we do not hear of the Klingons having attacked any major (by major I mean populated in the Billion) worlds. Perhaps they have wiped out mostly colonies, and lesser populated worlds. Also, in the Dominion War, the fact that the Dominion had to face 3 super powers means that the UFP could fight longer before their entire forces were wiped out, since the brunt of the attacks was separated over three fronts. In Yesterday's Enterprise, there was only the UFP, so all the strategic losses are theirs, and theirs alone... That can mean losing the ability to fight faster while losing less civilians... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enigma 521 Posted December 11, 2009 Well, the Dominion War was fought against an enemy that had over what, 30 000 ships, and had already attacked Earth, so it is plausible to think that had they continued to fight, the UFP could have lost many of its most populated worlds, while in Yesterday's enterprise, we do not hear of the Klingons having attacked any major (by major I mean populated in the Billion) worlds. Perhaps they have wiped out mostly colonies, and lesser populated worlds. Also, in the Dominion War, the fact that the Dominion had to face 3 super powers means that the UFP could fight longer before their entire forces were wiped out, since the brunt of the attacks was separated over three fronts. In Yesterday's Enterprise, there was only the UFP, so all the strategic losses are theirs, and theirs alone... That can mean losing the ability to fight faster while losing less civilians... Maybe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enigma 521 Posted December 11, 2009 . I did that because I couldn't delete the post. Therefore RayCav likes to screw the pooch repeatedly and very hard. RayCav loves to love little girls. The younger they are the harder he loves them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enigma 521 Posted December 12, 2009 And no this doesn't count as furry. Or pedo. Ahh, then you are a furry pedophile! Ok. At least you've cleared the air on that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
InvaderSkooj 1 Posted December 13, 2009 Your yuri is weak Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
