Ado Mortumee 500 Posted July 14, 2010 The Exodus Fleet of the Vasari Empire from Sins of a Solar Empire, by act of ROB, ends up in a remote sector of the Alpha Quadrant ten years before the start of the Dominion War. The Vasari will make first contact at the end of the ten years with the Alpha Quadrant powers. Starting fleet assets are as follows: 30 Jikara Navigator 250 Ravastra Skirmisher 120 Kanrak Assailant 100 Karrastra Destructor 400 Junsurak Sentinel 100 Jerun Migrator 100 Lasurak Transporter 100 Stilakus Subverter 100 Serevun Overseer 100 Skarovas Enforcer 2 Kortul Devastator 2 Skirantra Carrier 8 Jarrasul Evacuator 8 Antorak Marauder 2 Volkoras Desolator Type and number of planets in each of their one hundred starting systems: 1 Desert world. 2 Terrain worlds. 1 Volcanic world. 1 Ice world. 2 Gas giants. 8 Large Asteroids. 10 Junk belts and Asteroid belts. The Vasari start with all their technology available. No omnipotent or near omnipotent beings allowed. So how well does the Vasari Empire do? Can they survive in this new galaxy? Can they establish the Empire as the new dominate galactic power? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ado Mortumee 500 Posted July 17, 2010 So no ones going to post at all about how they think this will go? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khas 12,158 Posted July 17, 2010 Sorry, never played SoaSE. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Praeothmin 532 Posted July 17, 2010 Yeah, like he said... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ado Mortumee 500 Posted July 18, 2010 The wiki should have all the info you need on what the Vasari can do. Just a few things off the top of my head: 1. Standard weapons ranges in mid to high single digit thousands of kilometers. 2. Ship acceleration able to cross these same distances in a short amount of time if this part of in-game is anything to go by. 3. Ships can be built in minutes it seems given the fact their carrier has the ability to build new forces in a middle of a battle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khas 12,158 Posted July 18, 2010 I'm pretty sure the third part is simply game mechanics and therefore excluded from canon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Oragahn 0 Posted September 30, 2010 So no ones going to post at all about how they think this will go? It depends. Perhaps when the real original content of your post will represent more than 95% of the entire surface it heretically consumes on my screen instead of 5%. Other than that... has there been any quantification of value from the games? I have the first one and installed... versions... of the extensions (boring extensions btw). I didn't spot anything remotely looking like a bone. I mean, everything is about game mechanics. It's terribly pointless: systems have one star with silly colours and planets and other asteroid fields that don't orbit. Save that each planet is its own system... oh and teraton explosions against planet don't damage the texture... the surface I mean. Plus each admiral ship is about 2000 km long on the average. So that makes the windows... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Oragahn 0 Posted September 30, 2010 ST wins. I think we can shorten this post a little bit more. Try STW. Better, purge your signature and put STW in your sig instead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Oragahn 0 Posted October 1, 2010 No. N (as in Y/N) would have been shorter.No punctuation either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tyralak 12,068 Posted October 1, 2010 Go easy on him, Mr. O. Being a Warsie, it's a very difficult thing for him to admit Trek winning in any contest. It must have been terribly painful to type that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enigma 521 Posted October 1, 2010 Go easy on him, Mr. O. Being a Warsie, it's a very difficult thing for him to admit Trek winning in any contest. It must have been terribly painful to type that. Took your time out from sucking B&B's dicks to type that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enigma 521 Posted October 1, 2010 N (as in Y/N) would have been shorter.No punctuation either. . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tyralak 12,068 Posted October 1, 2010 Took your time out from sucking B&B's dicks to type that? Only because you couldn't finish the job. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Praeothmin 532 Posted October 1, 2010 Actually, Ty, Enigma's never had much problems admitting ST wins (see most of ST vs B5 or ST vs Covenent threads). The only times he cannot admit any chance of a win for anything ST in any circumstances is when it's ST vs SW... Then he's a SW wanker... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enigma 521 Posted October 1, 2010 *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* *wank on* *wank off* Whooaoaoaoaoaaaoooooooooooooah. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enigma 521 Posted October 1, 2010 Actually, Ty, Enigma's never had much problems admitting ST wins (see most of ST vs B5 or ST vs Covenent threads). The only times he cannot admit any chance of a win for anything ST in any circumstances is when it's ST vs SW... Then he's a SW wanker... Not exactly, if we had a debate between SW and ST uber beings then I'd side with ST. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Praeothmin 532 Posted October 1, 2010 Not exactly, if we had a debate between SW and ST uber beings then I'd side with ST. True, you have a hidden Trekkie side... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enigma 521 Posted October 1, 2010 I really have no preference as to which side other than Dr. Who. It is just on this board I feel I must take the SW side. Dr. Who puts them all to shame. VICTORY FOR THE DALEKS! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE! To show you how much a Whooligan I am, on my computer I use the DW theme song when Windows logs on and the Tardis taking off when I log off. Plus if there's a program error I have the Daleks soundbite "EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Questor 501 Posted October 1, 2010 Do the lot of you need a planetoid to come by to shut you up? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khas 12,158 Posted October 1, 2010 Why not a full-fledged planet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khas 12,158 Posted October 1, 2010 Daleks got nothin' on Jason... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Oragahn 0 Posted October 1, 2010 . That's not an opinion. Or such a small one that no focus could either determine if it's positive or negative. . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
