Jump to content
News Ticker
  • IPB version 4.2 installed!
Sign in to follow this  
Jason

Why no reason to assume that morar used in TOS "Arena" not nuclear

Recommended Posts

Argue Star War fans make is weak first no radiation   it weak arguement  because nuclear fusion does have radiation waste .  First we never get full view of what get hit distance a way not like looking up to see mushroom could. Or the weapon design way be no mushroom could because been energy waste creative it in practice.  If the get hit take enough damage next one done the job crew. Problem theory disable the vehicle they fire mortal shells which on it on like be using gunpowder or something slimier which not be effect by that.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It could have been antimatter-based.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end day effect nuclear or anti matter make sense. Make simple EW warfare made impossible for enemies Kirk fighting call for help. They unable contact ship first place. While weapon might not been disable there able call for help would have been. If was nuclear or anti matter basic the vehicle might take hit that disable it out right still able call for help.

 

By the way on Star Destroyer.Net I point out that moral shell could easily answer why the UFP last so long when came to The Siege of AR-558 and death total sky rocket. They even agree moral could be for people not train us special basic long range missiles. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×