Tyralak 12,068 Posted February 16, 2013 One of the most glaring examples of inconsistencies in Trek happens in Star Trek 5. The Enterprise managed to get to the center of the galaxy in a very short time, yet we know that in the entirety of previous and later Trek canon, Warp speed isn't anywhere near that fast. Case in point, Voyager needing 70 years to reach the Alpha Quadrant from the Delta Quadrant. How can this be reconciled? Especially since there was no special circumstances mentioned in the film, and nobody seemed to think it was out of the ordinary. Ideas? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khas 12,158 Posted February 16, 2013 Ummm, a giant subspace Slip-N-Slide? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Afishymeadow 534 Posted February 16, 2013 Production wise: Shatner & the writers didn't examine & think through what they were doing. And they really should have. If STV:TFF's accurate, then traveling to the Magellanic Clouds & the Andromeda Galaxy shouldn't be too bad of a trip. But then that doesn't jive with the Andromedan Kelvans taking 300 years to travel from Andromeda to the Milky Way, & vice-versa (& at maximum warp). In universe explanation: It's hard to reconcile with pre & post STV:TFF canonuity. I was lurking on TrekBBS one day & the issue of the 1701-A traveling to the center of the Galaxy in STV:TFF was being discussed, & somebody suggested perhaps the 'center of the galaxy' was just a name for an area of space, NOT the Milky Way's center, the area of space beyond The Barrier where 'God' lay in wait. Somehow this spatial region got that nickname. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scvn2812 504 Posted February 16, 2013 I think Fishy probably has the best fan theory. Its an area core ward but not the true center of the galaxy any more than the North Pole is the same as the North magnetic pole. On the other hand, we do have some very far flung star systems that would be very difficult to reach from Earth being part of the Federation such as Sirius which is something like 2k light years away if I remember correctly. There's a site I've seen that did a great job of cataloging and proposing theories for possible geographies for the Alpha and Beta quadrants. So maybe there is reason to believe that there are corridors that allow greater absolute speed per warp factor. Under this scheme, warp factor wouldn't be an absolute velocity, it would be engine output and your mileage would vary depending on the region of space you were traveling through. So the Federation could span 7,000 light years but it would be laid out more like a tangled string of christmas lights with the strings being corridors that allow higher velocities and the bulbs being zones of space around member worlds. I think that given the geographic issues like the Klingons invading the Cardassians and having been in at least a hundred year cold war with them previously, in spite of the fact that they'd either have had to go around or through Federation space, maybe we should look more at the age of colonialism as our model for Star Trek geography. Each major power has a heart land as the European powers did and these heart lands are relatively close to each other but they also have far flung colonial possessions where a lot of intrigue takes place away from the watchful eyes of each other's patrols and large diameter sensor arrays and plausible deniability rather than treaties holds sway, explaining and justifying how the Cardassians, Tholians and others can get away with massacring colonies and it taking 3 days for help to arrive so often. This is contradicted by in universe maps which show homogenous blobs of contiguous territory more like the settled borders of modern nation states than the imperial era but I think the colonial model fits the facts better as well as the original Horatio Hornblower / Wagon Train to the Stars / USA and USSR intriguing throughout the 3rd world model of Star Trek. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Afishymeadow 534 Posted February 17, 2013 I think that TrekBBSer had the right idea. NOT literally the center. Astrographically the true center is WAY WAY beyond UFP space & not to mention, a HUGE GIGANTIC BLACK HOLE! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khas 12,158 Posted February 17, 2013 On the other hand, we do have some very far flung star systems that would be very difficult to reach from Earth being part of the Federation such as Sirius which is something like 2k light years away if I remember correctly. I'm pretty sure you're thinking of Deneb. Sirius is only 8 light-years away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scvn2812 504 Posted February 18, 2013 I'm pretty sure you're thinking of Deneb. Sirius is only 8 light-years away. Except for Alpha Centauri and Wolf 359, my astronomy is a bit weak. I recalled reading about how there were a handful of stars that were very far out in comparison to the warp speeds implied by the series and most of the other stars mentioned. This is the site I found: http://www.stdimension.org/int/Cartography/cartography.htm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khas 12,158 Posted February 18, 2013 Astronomy's been a bit of a passion of mine since I was 2. It was born when I first saw Saturn on the intro of ST: TNG back in '93 (it was a repeat, as only the first two seasons had the planets of our solar system in their intros). Here are the distances of some stars from Earth: Alpha Centauri: 4.3 light-years Barnard's star: 5.9 light-years Wolf 359: 7.8 light-years Lalande 21185: 8.3 light-years Sirius: 8.6 light-years Epsilon Eridani: 10.5 light-years 61 Cygni: 11.4 light-years Procyon: 11.4 light-years Epsilon Indi: 11.8 light-years Tau Ceti: 11.9 light-years Gliese 876: 15.2 light-years 40 Eridani (Vulcan): 16.2 light-years Altair: 16.7 light-years Sigma Draconis: 18.8 light-years Delta Pavonis (Caladan): 19.9 light-years Vega: 25 light-years Fomalhaut: 25.1 light-years Chi Draconis (Minbar): 26.2 light-years Arcturus: 36.7 light-years Mu Arae: 50 light-years Aldebaran: 68 light-years Spica: 260 light-years Antares: 550 light-years Betelgeuse: 643 light-years Deneb: 806 light-years Rigel: 860 light-years Zeta Puppis: 1,090 light-years VY Canis Majoris: 3,900 light-years The Pistol Star: 25,000 light-years S Doradus: 169,000 light-years (for the record, this star is actually outside of the galaxy, located in the Large Magellanic Cloud) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tyralak 12,068 Posted February 18, 2013 That site shows the galactic core at 25,800 light years away from Earth. It's interesting that this site goes into a lot of detail about other inconsistencies in distances and rationalizes them, but there is no mention of Star Trek 5. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scvn2812 504 Posted February 18, 2013 Good catch, that seems to be a glaring oversight. Perhaps they intended to come up with a theory about it but it never came to fruition like a lot of the content on there that has been in progress for the better part of a decade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brian Young 11,994 Posted February 18, 2013 I don't suppose Sybok(?) being a madman has anything to do with it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scvn2812 504 Posted February 19, 2013 I don't suppose Sybok(?) being a madman has anything to do with it... Hard to say, its been a while since I saw the movie but I don't think his personal charisma / Vulcan mind powers on steroids would fully explain how everyone thought they were going to some place called the center of the galaxy. It could be a colloquial name or it could be evidence of the theorized warp highways that would allow rapid travel across great distances but along very narrow corridors, explaining oddball stars that seem to be impractical to be part of what we consider to be Federation space. Although given that the E-nil was capable of "5 year missions" hypothetically, there is nothing barring the colonization of stars that are impractical for trade or defense by expeditions or sentient species met at those distances from becoming members of the Federation, even though it would be impractical to maintain close ties with systems that would require a year or more of travel time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tyralak 12,068 Posted February 24, 2013 I don't suppose Sybok(?) being a madman has anything to do with it... Probably not. I'm fond of the "Warp Highway" theory. It would make sense that there were certain corridors where warp speed was increased. In Star Trek V, it was stated that no ship or probe had returned from the galactic core. Implying that there had been other attempts, and travel there was possible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scvn2812 504 Posted February 24, 2013 Inevitably the issue of Voyager would probably come up with regards to warp highways. Given that travel to the Delta and Gamma quadrants is considered extremely arduous, there are likely no charted warp highways leading out there. They may be exceedingly rare and may fluctuate in reliability. Obviously in her time exploring the Delta Quadrant, Voyager's path might as well have been a piece of thread in a Hobby Lobby for all the more territory she was able to cover in relation to the scale of space. I'm not sure if I'm fully sold on the idea but I don't reject the notion of warp highways out of hand. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Afishymeadow 534 Posted February 24, 2013 Shatner should've done his homework:( &/or the writer(s) he hired. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scvn2812 504 Posted February 24, 2013 Shatner should've done his homework:( &/or the writer(s) he hired. They went to the edge of the galaxy in TOS, you can't really fault him for thinking there's nothing wrong with going to the center of the galaxy. Obviously no one thought to tell him or his writers that warp speed was being tamed. This might even have been before the retcon limiting warp speeds and the area of the series to the tiniest of portions of the Milky Way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tyralak 12,068 Posted March 16, 2013 They went to the edge of the galaxy in TOS, you can't really fault him for thinking there's nothing wrong with going to the center of the galaxy. Obviously no one thought to tell him or his writers that warp speed was being tamed. This might even have been before the retcon limiting warp speeds and the area of the series to the tiniest of portions of the Milky Way. After re-watching TOS, I'm convinced this is the answer. In TOS and throughout all the TOS films, there was no indication that Warp speed was all that limited. In TOS, they routinely go much greater distances than they do in TNG era series and movies. It's only in TNG that we start seeing severely handicapped Warp speeds. Not a change I'm very happy with, BTW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Afishymeadow 534 Posted March 17, 2013 After re-watching TOS, I'm convinced this is the answer. In TOS and throughout all the TOS films, there was no indication that Warp speed was all that limited. In TOS, they routinely go much greater distances than they do in TNG era series and movies. It's only in TNG that we start seeing severely handicapped Warp speeds. Not a change I'm very happy with, BTW. "Force of Nature"! WHY did they make that episode? WHY curtail FUN & ADVENTURE? ST is for our fun, enjoyment, to explore ideas, Entc Ent al, so naturally B&B let an episode ship out & on the air RESTRICTING WARP DRIVE! WHY?!?! They forgot it's science FICTION! They can take "Force of Nature" and jab it in their ears like a rusty screwdriver. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scvn2812 504 Posted March 17, 2013 After re-watching TOS, I'm convinced this is the answer. In TOS and throughout all the TOS films, there was no indication that Warp speed was all that limited. In TOS, they routinely go much greater distances than they do in TNG era series and movies. It's only in TNG that we start seeing severely handicapped Warp speeds. Not a change I'm very happy with, BTW. Why? What's the difference? Its a show about exploration. Everything taking place in a 10,000 light year bubble is still a ridiculously huge playground for the powers that be to run around in. At the rate we're discovering extra solar planets there could be literally billions of planets and perhaps millions of Earth like worlds in that bubble. The Vulcans could have colonized a new planet every year for the 2,000 years or so they've had deep space flight capability and still not claimed much of the real estate available in that region. What does having access to the entire galaxy add to the series? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Afishymeadow 534 Posted March 18, 2013 The Milky Way's Center thing is one of the big gripes &/or annoyances STV:TFF's critics have about & with it. At the very least, that element should've been thought out better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Khas 12,158 Posted March 18, 2013 That was one of my smaller gripes. My biggest gripe was the fan dance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scvn2812 504 Posted March 19, 2013 Cue the squinty eyed Fry meme: Not sure if fan dance demeans Uhura or is liberating. O.o Share this post Link to post Share on other sites