Why the Valakians most likley did not died out.

[Jason 27]

Two differnt reason think unlikley that Valakians died out. At least some Valakians would by chance Gene over come problems. Secound Valakians fighting surival and there is great differnt between Valakian save own race or endanger life form.Valakians notes about gene problem ways slove they not have notice if was another race try save.

[Questor 501]

<Looks at thread title> This'll be good.

 

 

 

Two differnt reason think unlikley that Valakians died out. At least some Valakians would by chance Gene over come problems. Secound Valakians fighting surival and there is great differnt between Valakian save own race or endanger life form.Valakians notes about gene problem ways slove they not have notice if was another race try save.

 

 

 

 

 

Why is this relevant? We don't condem the religious interpretation of the prime directive because of the results, we condem it because it encourages evil acts. Allowing the Valakians to die was an evil act, no matter if they actually died or not.

 

 

 

Were the Nazis any less evil because some Jews survived? What about Rowanda? Darfur? None of those genocides are 100% effective, but yet they are still evil.

 

 

 

"The only thing neccessary for evil to triumph in this world is for good men to do nothing."

[Jason 27]

No suestion Archer did right per say. On other hand FDR during Holocaust did something even little worst. Obama and Bush turn other cheek during Darfur. No sugestion they charge for genicide. Archer also did for what worth Vakalkians pain killer allow little less pain came fight of this gene probelms.

[Gonzo 0]

No suestion Archer did right per say. On other hand FDR during Holocaust did something even little worst. Obama and Bush turn other cheek during Darfur. No sugestion they charge for genicide. Archer also did for what worth Vakalkians pain killer allow little less pain came fight of this gene probelms.

 

 

 

DANGGGGIIIT!!!!!!

[InvaderSkooj 1]