Jump to content
News Ticker
  • IPB version 4.2 installed!

Questor

Inquisitorius
  • Content Count

    1,708
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Questor


  1. I should point out that I'm referring to being tired of arguments about canon (which is what I was trying to imply with my reference to the reformation, but that may not have come through.)

     

     

     

    I have no problem with other aspects of vs, but canon arguments really just make me feel like I'm reading debates about whether the evolution of the english language is changing the preposition rules (yes it probably is, no it doesn't matter because nobody's actually paid attention to those rules in spoken english outside of a couple weeks of grammar class in the last 500 years - no joke, five centuries. Shakespear did it.)

     

     

     

    I'm bored. I can't sleep. Can you tell?


  2. Shields on photorps are actually one theory of why they can be "modulated" and shoot out through shields. The idea is that they have weak shields that cancel out the existing shield as they pass through. I've never heard anyone propose that those sheilds could be used to defend the torpedoes on unmodified weapons, though.

     

     

     

    The point defense phasers used in the ferengi wormhole episode would kind of disagree with the concept of powerful photon shields, though.


  3. But the purpose of the vs area is to debate. If all you're going to do is slam a person into the ground or threaten them then you're not playing right hehe

     

     

     

    While I think it's been amply demonstrated that if Paul claimed the sky was blue, I'd most likely say it was green...

     

     

     

    He's right.

     

     

     

    If people don't like Jason and don't want to debate him, they should just ignore him - there's even a handy feature on the board to do it with. I make a point of reading all of his posts, and usually try to come up with something productive to say if I'm going to say anything. I'm not a fan of the "say whatever comes to mind," and generally don't say anything unless I have something to say.

     

     

     

    People who just fling abuse at Jason make this place look like 4chan's unpopular little brother, and also make everyone here look immature and cruel. Let's all behave like the putative adults I think most of us are and actually debate Jason. Instead of abusing him, try and actually refute his points. Heck, maybe even actually look at what's being said and respond thoughtfully, although I know that might be asking too much from this crowd.


  4. You shouldn't, unless you decide to travel abroad, but the members of this board don't all live in Texas, so the information was not just for you, but for the general populace... smile.gif

     

     

     

    So, of the ten people who post on this board, 20 percent lived in Texas and moved to CA. We're also smart enough to know that a child's rhyme to keep themselves safe was not the only way to tell a viper from a constricting snake, right Tyralak?

     

     

     

    What's your complaint? Or are you just living up to your sig?


  5. You don't even need to go that far. There's a DS9 episode where an admiral states that they have enough personal forcefields to equip an entire army. Why they haven't done so is anyone's guess. My bet is that Starfleet Command is staffed by complete morons.

     

     

     

    Since as far as we know, the UFP has no free standing army (in the 24th century), they should have enough forcefield generators to equip every away team in every starship.

     

     

     

    I think its more that forcefields might just have a very limited use. Can a phaser work through a personal forcefield? how do you prevent people from just modulating to shoot through it. Even Klingon rogues without modern equipment can pull off that trick, at least in the abstract.

     

     

     

    Would you deploy personal forcefields in large scale (division and corps +) ground combat, or even similar scale counter insurgencies? Yeah, then it probably makes sense. Does it make sense for small scale engagements, maybe not - I have no idea.

     

     

     

    The fact of the matter is that just that one line really doesn't tell us anything other than that they exist (and therefor contradicting that nice piece of jumped up fanon that Paul and Jason are such fans of). What they are used for, and how? We don't know. My explanation of limited uses and forcing the use of melee weapons has the nice bonus of explaining the Klingon fascination with bladed weapons, but it is no more or less valid than any other theory that explains why they don't show up anywhere other than the animated series.


  6. I fucking HATE snakes. However, some good news. It looks like Instituto Bioclon still makes an anti venom. It's not approved here yet, but I can't imagine the FDA wouldn't eventually approve it if it's the only choice.

     

     

     

    Of course it will, and the reason that they stopped making it (as I understand it) was that the new one was coming and the supplies of the old one were so high that no one had ordered in a long time.

     

     

     

    The point was to illustrate how similar looking things can be completely different. If someone were to throw a coral snake at a camera, teling which it is without freeze frame would be rather difficult.

     

     

     

    I, of course, don't recommend throwing coral snakes at anything, it's a good way to get a dose of neurotoxin.


  7. A - That was a holodeck episode

     

     

     

    B - The two look nothing alike. And even if they did, oxygen looks the same as CO2 under visible light too, that doesn't make them the same thing by a long shot.

     

     

     

    P.S. One of these:

     

    thumb50_Aposematic_coloration_coral_snake_DP740.jpg

     

     

     

    looks about as much like one of these:

     

     

     

    Quiz1A.jpg

     

     

     

    As those two do. Are they the same snake?

     

     

     

    Before you answer, I'd remind you that they stopped making coral snake anti-venom a few years ago.


  8. To make simple personal force field one many type combat equipment never get see UFP personal but talking used off screen. photon granade best example of that. Simple put he heard first TNG basic heard at least few time DS9 and we heard sound effect in Voy.

     

     

     

     

     

    You have yet to present an application where a personal forcefield is used in combat, and frankly, a personal forcefield is an idiotic way to cambat anyone other than the federation. Either the forcefield will repel everything (making uses other than buckler style setups rather dicey as they repell the user from the ground) or they will only defend against energy, which means that either slug throwers, bows and arrows, or broadswords are about to make a huge comeback.

     

     

     

    Hrmm... there might actually be evidence for the use of personal forcefields in recent klingon history now that I think about it. Of course, there is no evidence that anyone else in ST ever had extensive use of them.

     

     

     

    Jason - you keep making "tech level" arguments and forgetting that optimization happens against certain threats and that there are almost always counters to a possible defense. Just because something is "more advanced" doesn't make it more dangerous - althought there are limits, generally at what I call the Clarkian bounderies - the places where technology becomes indistinguishable from magic. I would put my money on Patton commanding a modern Third Army (or even his own, but that would be approaching a clarkian situation) over - say - Picard commanding any amount of federation equipment we've seen onscreen. Do you understand why?

     

     

     

    The reason why the personal forcefield (especially a buckler style forcefield) would be a good idea for enemies of the federation is because of the Federation's painfully stupid refusal to adopt anything but the most technological way to solve a problem unless they are forced to. How many years has starfleet been fighting the borg and they've never bothered to issue something as simple to replicate as a battleaxe or even a sword to teams GUARANTEED to encounter borg patrols? Heck, even if the borg can adapt to bullets (I don't believe it and you'll never convince me they can, so don't even bother trying - but I'm going to grant that they can simply to point out how stupid the space hippies are in this context), we've been shown time and again that blunt and tearing trauma damages them severely.


  9. A stromtrooper hit R2-D2 very effective during Star War return of Jedi. It like plot say Stromtrooper has good aim he has good aim. When Star Terk plot say UFP personal has personal force field he has personal force field.

     

     

     

    WHAT?

     

     

     

    Are you joking?


  10. Well, Questor, since they wanted to equip military personel with these in case of an invasion of Earth, my guess (and yes, it is only a guess) would be protection in a fight...

     

     

     

    The problem with that idea is that they never used them anywhere else. Perhaps they were getting ready for a biohazard issue?

     

     

     

     

    As to why they stopped wearing armor, we'll have to go with your interpretation, because it sure beats:

     

    "They all became dumb!"

     

     

     

     

     

    tongue.gif

     

     

     

     

    Agreed.


  11. Well, there are none that I know of for the armor, but here's the DS9 "Homefront" quotes for the personal shields:

     

     

     

    My new question is not "What are they used for outside of hazardous environments? (I'm even going to TAS for support)"

     

     

     

    As for armor, they did wear them in ST II, and ST III.

     

    Why they stopped wearing armor is anyone's guest, but they did...

     

     

     

     

    Because they became space-hippies or space-NOAA, and stopped being a space navy?


  12. Crumple zones? Are you kidding me? Why?

     

     

     

    If you are seriously proposing that the designers of the Sovereign class wasted space, not to mention life support on crumple zones... On the off chance that somebody would ram?

     

     

     

    You want to know why the E-D saucer did so well? It's quite simple, it was designed to handle that kind of stress. It probably had special capacito-fed SIF and IDG generators, and it came in at a relatively shallow angle after bleeding most of it's velocity off. I'll do a scaling later, but I doubt it impacted at more than 150 kph, if that. Another thing that could have been used were tractor beams. Remember, as soon as it hits atmosphere, the AG should shut off, giving a power surplus, shields would cutout darn quick after reentry too, air regen should shut down around 10,000 feet, propulsion should have been dumped after the de-orbit burn (course, that's a net power loss, fusion reactors not being something you want to carry into a crash landing). The saucer should have a decent glide ratio as well. Logically, you should also be dumping as many escape pods as possible, ordinance dump, blackbox jettison, and lots of other stuff designed to aid survival.

     

     

     

    As for the ramming, velocities in space are almost impossible to judge, but simply the shape of the Scimitar is going to change the way the damage occurs


  13. The Intrepid-class USS Voyager had a crew complement of 141 when departing Deep Space 9 in 2371. (VOY: "Caretaker") Throughout the its journey in the Delta Quadrant, the ship operated with a crew of approximately 150.

     

     

     

    Exactly how many people were on that Maquis ship? I would have guessed even less than the nine we need at a minimum to make that work, and we know Voyager took casualties - notably the entire medical staff, the first officer, the chief engineer, and the helmsman.

×