Jump to content
News Ticker
  • IPB version 4.2 installed!

JohnM81

Members
  • Content Count

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About JohnM81

  • Rank
    Member
  1. JohnM81

    stardestroyer.net forums

    Yeah but the direction of that line of thought died off pretty quickly when they knew I would point to the evidence of the awings as brought up by brian in return of the jedi.
  2. JohnM81

    stardestroyer.net forums

    Thanks, they seemed not to want to accept the canon evidence and it was obvious they didn't even watch the video. It got so bad at one point that I had to spoon feed them with this post: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I did. Its okay i'll hold your hand through this once again I would point to time stamp 5:45 - 6:50 of Brian's video. I would point to time stamp 8:18 - 8:25 of Brian's video. I would point to time stamp 10:28 - 10:59 of Brian's video. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These are just select segments of your video that specifically stated a shield (of space ships) was up and then fighters took out the shield generators.
  3. JohnM81

    stardestroyer.net forums

    Yeah that seemed to be a sticking point with them, so I posted this just to get over it because I felt it was detracting from the main topic: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just in case this romulan disruptor using antimatter is a sticking point for you all and is detracting from the main topic of this thread there is other canon evidence of a/m (anti-protons) being shot out of federation ships as a particle stream which would work as well. Canon Evidence: http://www.tubeplus.me/player/1339201/S ... _Blood/%22 Time stamp= 35:55 Time stamp= 43:58 You will note that Janeway states that the anti-matter pulse wont do much good against shields as expected antimatter needs direct contact with matter to be effective. So there you go MORE canon evidence that anti-matter can be used as a weapon and precedent exists. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  4. JohnM81

    stardestroyer.net forums

    I will admit that the folks at the SDnet forums are a very hostile bunch and attack at pretty much any post that isn't praising SW saga in some way. But they are a bunch that demand evidence so I collected evidence from Brian's excellent work (case studies) and posted a thread basically stating here is a way that ST forces might win a single space engagement utilizing the SW shields and ST anti-matter case studies. Well so far its been a vigorous debate and at this point they are desperately grasping for straws in the face of the volume of Brian's canon evidence. If any of you are interested the thread is: http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=158151 And of course Brian, this is the result of your hard work so I tried to cite you and give you credit for your work. (besides I don't want them thinking that ugly mug in the videos is me!! j/k j/k lol)
  5. In terms of watts dissipation, what is the generally agreed upon shield strength of a galaxy class star ship in the trekkie universe?
×